As Seen On TV
Petrozza's Journey Through 'Hell'
By SaraC
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:08:30 GMT
Louis Petrozza didn't quite make it all the way through Chef Gordon Ramsay's culinary gauntlet, "Hell's Kitchen" – but he came close. This season's runner-up gives us the dirt behind the potentially disastrous snafu that happened during the show's finale, his favorite insult from the foul-mouthed Ramsay, and why he's happy with how it all ended.So did the wrong chef win?
Did the wrong chef win? See, that would be saying that Ramsay made the wrong decision. Should I have been the one that won? Yeah, I gotta say, I guess I should have. Who would say that they wouldn’t want it? Are there other positives to me coming in second? I think there are. I think I’m going to have many doors opening for me and I think that I have achieved a level of success. I am happy with it.
At this point, does it matter that you didn't win? I'm sure there are so many options open to you now.
You have to look at it that way, ya know? You have to look at it that way. I have no time to feel sorry for myself or second-guess the decisions that I made, so it’s pointless. It would be so counter-productive. I’m very content with where I’m at. I would love to be able to spend more time with Ramsay. I guess that’s my only regret. Because, like, do we keep in touch? Does he call me? No. But you know, he's still kind of a friend. He is one of those guys I know I will see again and when we see each other he’s going to be happy to see me and I’m going to be happy to see him. He has a level of respect for me and I certainly have a high respect for him.
Walk me through what you were thinking as you stand in front of the door, turn the knob, and watch Christina walk through.
Oh, this freaks everybody out. You want to know something crazy? There was a malfunction [and my door opened too]. Crazy, right? But, it wasn’t like it was this horrible thing. It actually worked out perfect. Ramsay saw it was happening and he goes, “Petrozza,” and he grabs me and he pulled me towards him and kinda hugged me and held me at the same time. And I realized that my door shouldn’t have opened. And he said, “It’s ok, Petrozza. It’s alright, man.” I said, “I’m ok, I’m ok.” Ya know? And I understood what happened. It took me a few seconds to understand what was happening and I was a little confused as you can understand. But when her door opened and she went downstairs and then Ramsay and I went downstairs, I felt relieved that it was done. I felt that I had made some good friends and I was very successful at what I attempted. It was all good.

What's the best piece of advice you received from Chef Ramsay?
Ya know, Ramsay bolstered my idea of keeping it real and that you’re not going to get ahead or further yourself by making somebody else look bad. I’ve never seen that work before. Somebody with half a brain is going to see through that façade.
Did you have a favorite insult from Ramsay throughout the show?
Yeah, you wanna hear something that he called me that I don’t think made it on [the show]? As a matter of fact, I didn’t even hear the first time that he said it. When I was up at the pass and I was trying to scoot around him to get some food up there behind him he called me a baby rhino [Laughter]. He called me a baby rhino! [The show's producers] sat me in a confession and said, "How did you feel when Chef Ramsay called you a baby rhino?" I said, "He called me a baby rhino!? I didn’t hear him!" And then he said it to me again another time. I can’t believe that.
Ya know, I could’ve missed that on one of the shows. I always have a ton of people around when I’m watching these episodes [on TV] and sometimes people walk in front of the television and the phone is ringing, so it might have made it on the show. Ya know, I think there's 20 percent of the scenes from “Hell’s Kitchen” I haven’t seen yet.
Matt was one of the more interesting contestants, although his cooking skills seemed far below everyone else's. How did he even make it on the show?Funny you should bring that up. I mean, it’s no secret. It’s a reality show – it’s not just a straight-up cooking show. There are a number of different factors [on who gets cast on the show], and character is one of them, for better or worse. An exciting character is something that is taken into consideration. And I think that's the case in most aspects of life. I don’t care if you're a professor at a college. Ya know what? If you got a monotone unenthusiastic way about you you’re not going to be a good teacher. If you’re not an aggressive racecar driver- ya know- and you’re not pumped up about it - you’re not going to be good at that. It goes the same with TV and cooking, ya know?
So now that the show is over, you must have a lot of options in front of you. Do you have any set plans?
I don’t have any real set plans. If I did I would share them with you. There are no more secrets, so it's nice to wake up today with no secrets that I have to keep. I’ve been keeping them in for a while. But as far as plans, I just love cooking. That’s what I know how to do. It’s exciting and there are all kinds of aspects of it. I did [a demonstration] on Fox News where I had three different flambés going at one time. It was fun, it was edgy. I like teaching people and you kind of immortalize yourself when you teach and it is such a beautiful thing to be able to share like that. I like mixing the media and cooking thing. The cooking thing I know. The media thing, I dunno know, maybe I can do it but I’m going to attack it.
Who knows? Hey, I made it through "Hell’s Kitchen," what can’t I do? What you believe is true is what’s true. So, until I’m shown otherwise, I’m gonna go for it.
***What do you think? Should Gordon Ramsay have selected Petrozza to be his executive chef? Click here to comment!
Plus, click here to read our interview with Hell’s Kitchen winner, Christina Machamer!
Message Edited by SaraC on 07-11-2008 11:25 AM
Comment
No, I do not believe Chef Ramsay should have selected Petrozza. Petrozza is a great Chef, but not as level headed as Christina. He could not handle the heat in the kitchen.Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:27:43 GMT | debraann
Comment
I agree with Ramsey's choice. I felt Christina had a lot more potential than Petrozza, more sophisticated taste and was more focused on her goal. I think Petrozza was a fun guy who really was an excellent cook, but who would not have been able to work for Ramsey long term because of his sloppiness in the kitchen.Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:29:44 GMT | kidzmom42
Comment
Christina was the best choice for the job. However, as soon as Petrozza opens his restaurant in NC I will be the first person to make reservations. I liked his menu and his food was comfort food up a notch. Petrozza should open his restaurant and then go on Iron Chef America. It will be the best show ever because he is so messsssy.Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:33:36 GMT | anjiebrigg
Comment
I think the wrong person was selected. I think Christina is way too immature to handle what is coming her way. During the finale she kept saying that she won't have to work this hard again. Wrong...she is going to have to work even harder. I don't she was creative at all. If Ramsay wanted a Manager, then he will get a Manager out of her; however, if he wanted a chef, he should have choosen Petrozza. "P" was creative and imaginative with his dishes. Christina took the easy way out with all her dishes. Wrong move Ramsay.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:15:11 GMT | starfishlbi
Comment
I wouldn't have hired any one of that lot. I thought the talent this year was far weaker than the other seasons. But, down to the final two, Chef Ramsay made the correct decision.Baby rhino - classic!
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:49:17 GMT | ricobricobrico
Comment
I would have loved to see Petrozza win. He's a great guy and what a terrific cook. I understand very well why Ramsay selected Christina when he said he was thinking of the long term. It would have been great to actually see them both walk through the doors together because they are really 'both' winners in my opinion.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:49:28 GMT | blueberrypie
Comment
Nicely said Starfishlbi! My family and I couldn't agree more!Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:56:34 GMT | shepdizzle
Comment
Chef Ramsey is the BEST! My choice would have been Petrozza but I have no experience in the kitchen, therefore I trust Chef Ramsey. He is the BEST! Now JEN, what a Big puppy[B]. Jen set a really bad example of a future Chef and the nerves to ask Chef Ramsey for a reference? if in doubt check with your attorney, Jen is not to be trusted. The only reference Jen would get from me would be a copy of the video tape from the show.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:00:13 GMT | BonnieT
Comment
I totally agree with starfishlbi's comments because Christina kept saying that it was going to be the last night that she had to work hard. I don't consider being Head Chef at a 4-5 star restaurant a cakewalk!! I think that Petrozza should have won. I feel like Chef Ramsay was looking at the shelf life of Christina without looking at the heart and talent of Petrozza. When faced with challenges, Chef Ramsay had to snap Christina back into focus by threatening to run the kitchen for her, while at the same time, when Petrozza's team ran out of appetizers, Chef Ramsay asked what he was prepared to do, he immediately came up with another appetizer which went over very well with his guests. Petrozza wanted to win and would have done anything (I believe) to make sure he made Chef Ramsay feel that he made the right decision in selecting him...hey, only time will tell.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:03:49 GMT | malteselover1972
Comment
Petrozza did not "immediately" come up with a substitute appetizer. In fact, he couldn't make a decision; he seemed lost for some time. Finally, he asked for help and Bobby came up with the risotto idea. I think that moment, combined with his failure to prepare by checking his stock, was his undoing. But I like the guy and I hope he does well.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:28:20 GMT | deecee
Comment
Malteselover and starfishlbi, I agree totally with your comments. Although I haven't been watching the show all season, I think I saw enough to tell me that Chef Ramsey picked the wrong person as far as management, personality, and cooking goes. Christina was too whiney for me, complaining about 'the stripes' of the decor, thinking she won't have to work hard again (is she for real?), and she ran a sloppy shop (in my opinion). Petrozza should have won on merit, personality, and creativity. However, the point of longevity probably was factored into the equation; also, Christina still needs more guidance than "P" does. I think Chef Ramsey thinks so too, which is why he chose her. Of course, all of this is my personal opinion. Besides, could Chef Ramsey have kissed on Petrozza as many times as I saw him kissing on Christina last night? What was up with that??Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:31:20 GMT | Sowelu
Comment
I am a chef with over twenty years experience. I would not hire any of the contestents to be an executive chef for any new restaurant that I was opening, I don't care how big or small. This is based on the facade presented by the show. I saw some talent there but more drama than a kitchen of mine will ever have. It's laughable to think that Christina will be "Executive Chef" for long.Gordon, you really impressed me at times with your skills, but anybody, myself included, can be foul mouthed and **bleep** off. I have learned that a less abrasive approach combined with staff education is the
best policy
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:41:58 GMT | hashbrown
Comment
I think Chef Ramsay made a mistake, Petrozza should of won. I wonder how much age played into his pick? Christina will fail because she will lose the respect of the other chefs she will have to work with. Why do I say this because she has foul mouth and is far to cut throat. While the show is a game on many levels, in the real life you have to work together, and being "nasty" only gose so far. I thought Petrozza showed he could be firm but also worked with others without the nasty edge Christina showed. Maybe in Chef Ramsay kitchen you can toss all those insults, but the ones I have worked in it won't float. The show is fun to watch but far from what a real kitchen is about.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:42:50 GMT | cjjanis001
Comment
Christina is going to find the Executive Chef position a hard row to hoe. At best, she's got the skills of an entry level sous chef, and she's going to be in charge of better, brighter, and more seasoned chefs making far less than $250K? I'm betting there's a non-performance clause in her contract that'll let Ramsey dump her when the time's right.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:40:54 GMT | acehi
Comment
i feel out of the two Petrozza should have won. He got there for a reason. He may have been messy. But he could cook. I think instead of Ramsay having the loseing contestants who can sabotoge like petrossa's girl did by not cooking onion rings ..come on... i can cook onion rings in a heart beat. i think he should have all suchiefs helping out as a cooking crew and that way the two who may try to win will have to make up the menu and run the front like a real chief should. that is more fare to me. this girl should not have won ... she messed up on what she was cooking on her station almost every week.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:29:49 GMT | jungleface
Comment
I agree with starfishlbi, malteselover, and jungleface on most of their points. I thought P really showed character and sincerity. He never whined or did the whole back-biting thing that everyone else did. He also rarely got called out for a bad service performance. Christina had several "melt downs" and more than once her food was returned. Heck, she messed P up when he was at the pass while cooking fish.Anyway, I know it is all a show and I really love Ramsay to death. I just think if he knew he wanted a relatively "young" chef, he should have made that clear and not had the other, older contestants get their hopes up of winning. I think even long-term P would have been the best bet - no doubt he could have taught his successor and there would have been no loss in continuity.
I was disappointed but it's not my restaurant. I wish them both the best - I can't cook a lick but wish it were me!
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:59:29 GMT | poisongoth69
Comment
I agree. Age discrimination just like the real world workplace. Everyone knows that Chef Ramsay will getmore workhorse years from Christina than Petrozza. It is sad that nice guys really do always seem to end last. Petrozza was honest, fair, unlike Christina who stated she could trick Matty into doing what she wanted by sucking up. What a waste!
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:27:29 GMT | samuel41_2001
Comment
I heard Chef Ramsey did not give Christina the position of exec. Chef right away, instead a different position at the same restaurant and she will have to work her way up to that position. Has anyone else heard this. Either way I wish her good luck and I wish Petroza all the best also. And I LOVE CHEF RAMSEY!!!Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:11:37 GMT | Stacy108
Comment
Petrozza was my favorite from the start! I wanted him to win, as he was genuinely a nice guy! Maybe it was his age, as he is not much older than I am, and he was a great chef. I never liked Christina. Spoiled little brat, but I do have to say she was talented when it came to cooking. I feel Petrozza should've won, but with placing 2nd, he will still do well.Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:14:01 GMT | landensgma