Write That Down
Does MMA Need Instant Replay?
By ComcastSports
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:21:46 GMT
By Chris Young, Comcast.net Sports

The NFL, NBA, and MLB use it. Even Tennis has “Shot Spot.” And sooner rather than later, the playback gift of modern technology could be headed for mixed martial arts.
At least that’s what Keith Kizer, the director of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, is saying should happen, according to Cagewriter.com
The latest push for cageside replay comes less than a week after Mirko “Cro Cop” Filipovic’s accidental eye poke led to his first-round stoppage of Mostapha Al-Turk at UFC 99 in Germany. Al-Turk was visibly shaken by the poke, shielding his left eye with his glove when Filipovic moved in and landed a huge right that sent him reeling to the canvas, where the fight was eventually stopped by referee Dan Miragliotta.
The errant shot was missed by Miragliotta who should have brought a temporary halt to the bout to have Al-Turk’s eye examined.
But the shot didn’t escape the big screens at Laxness Arena, nor did it swing wide of Kizer’s gaze here in the States.
Kizer told MMAJunkie Radio that there is a growing need to aid fighters and officials inside the cage and that the accidental shot that incidentally costs Al-Turk the match could have been avoided. He likened the scenario to Anthony Johnson’s loss last July to Kevin Burns at Ultimate Fight Night 14:
It's time to get with the times. If Dana White and Co. want to make a statement that UFC cares about the safety of its fighters and the validity of its results, they need to institute replay or some form of supportive judging.
What do you think? Should mixed martial arts implement instant replay? Will it slow the sport down or help it grow? Sound off here.
Message Edited by ComcastSports on 06-18-2009 06:33 PM

The NFL, NBA, and MLB use it. Even Tennis has “Shot Spot.” And sooner rather than later, the playback gift of modern technology could be headed for mixed martial arts.
At least that’s what Keith Kizer, the director of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, is saying should happen, according to Cagewriter.com
The latest push for cageside replay comes less than a week after Mirko “Cro Cop” Filipovic’s accidental eye poke led to his first-round stoppage of Mostapha Al-Turk at UFC 99 in Germany. Al-Turk was visibly shaken by the poke, shielding his left eye with his glove when Filipovic moved in and landed a huge right that sent him reeling to the canvas, where the fight was eventually stopped by referee Dan Miragliotta.
The errant shot was missed by Miragliotta who should have brought a temporary halt to the bout to have Al-Turk’s eye examined.
But the shot didn’t escape the big screens at Laxness Arena, nor did it swing wide of Kizer’s gaze here in the States.
Kizer told MMAJunkie Radio that there is a growing need to aid fighters and officials inside the cage and that the accidental shot that incidentally costs Al-Turk the match could have been avoided. He likened the scenario to Anthony Johnson’s loss last July to Kevin Burns at Ultimate Fight Night 14:
Let's say the doctor looked at Mr. Al Turk, or the situation we had with Anthony Johnson, and says, 'He can not continue.' So the fight's over, so it's not going to change the strategy whether the referee changes his mind on the call. In those situations, then the ref can look at it and say, 'You know what, it was an accidental foul. Let's go to the scorecards.' Or in the other situation, 'I thought it was an accidental foul to go to the scorecards, but on instant replay it was actually a legal punch.' Either way, the fighter could not continue, so it wouldn't have mattered, and we can take our time and look at it.First Anthony Johnson (who was dominating Burns), and now Mostapha Al-Turk. Both fighters were rendered defenseless after their incidents and both lost because of them. The question isn't whether mixed martial arts needs instant replay; the question is how many more fighters will continue to be at risk of serious injury without it?
It's time to get with the times. If Dana White and Co. want to make a statement that UFC cares about the safety of its fighters and the validity of its results, they need to institute replay or some form of supportive judging.
What do you think? Should mixed martial arts implement instant replay? Will it slow the sport down or help it grow? Sound off here.
Message Edited by ComcastSports on 06-18-2009 06:33 PM
Comment
hell yes it does... as technical as the sport is it needs the innovation of instant replay.. no doubt about itThu, 18 Jun 2009 21:14:51 GMT | TheDemonHunter
Comment
NOOOOOOOO!!!!! it is a sport based off of brutality with rules. its the refs fault and if something happens to the fighter the ref should get in trouble. dont ruin this sport with instant replay. the sport is great and people are trying to soften it up. I say no let the guy get knocked out cause if his eye hurt that bad he couldn't fight he should have said something to the ref. its his own fault and the sport needs innovations at all!Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:42:58 GMT | captskeech1989
Comment
no innovations at all!!!Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:43:52 GMT | captskeech1989
Comment
Why not instead put seated, alternate refs outside the cage on each fence panel so all view are covered from outside the ring. One of the alternates would have seen the eye polk right? Then he could throw a towel, stand up and call a halt to the inside ref, something to stop the fight momentarily.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:50:39 GMT | landshark
Comment
This sport is all about rhythm. If you stop a fight , even though it may be warranted, you allow the fighter on the short end of the stick to get his momentum back or at the very least stop the momentum of the fight. You might as well have the fighters call for a "do-over". Instant replay will ruin this sport. Crappy things happen from time to time and that's how life works. Stop destroying sports with all this "fairness" stuff. Real sports are for real men and real men deal with adversity, not whine about it not being fair.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:02:11 GMT | jazzkenpo
Comment
whats gonna be next....pillow fights? instant replay, give me a break.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:16:42 GMT | fastmax
Comment
I agree with landshark. Multiple refs with different views outside cage to protect fighters. None of this instant replay bull. This isn't a play-by-play sport like baseball or football.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:24:23 GMT | derrin
Comment
NO, and let's drop this stupid subject.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:31:42 GMT | gutjosgt3
Comment
Forget about it!! These guys no what can happen in that ring. They are tough guys remember. I agree they will ruin the sport if they do **bleep** like that.Let them fight dam it!!!!!
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:48:45 GMT | KidCanvas
Comment
These fighters fight with lighing speed and as any magician knows the hand is faster than the eye,but not faster than the camera. It would be better for the fights to have instant replay and prevent fighters from winning by fouls. The sport might be brutal but it should be fair just as in the jousts of the knights.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:50:10 GMT | ssor51
Comment
just to sum up what was already said"excellent idea of having refs on the outside to see more. eye poke ,scroyum kick,these things happen and when witnessed the fighter gets time to recoupe.FINE... replay WILL NOT protect the fighters because whats done is done.it will add controversy to an already VERY popular sport.overturned decisions etc...Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:58:19 GMT | armstrong197788
Comment
Message Edited by BigLT on 06-19-2009 12:07 PM
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:33:23 GMT | BigLT
Comment
I saw one of my favorite fighters lose a title due to an eye poke.You can put refs outside,however they will make the same mistakes as the judges do on the scorecards.It took a very long time to get this sport on the tube,and that was due to it's "brutality!" Sorry! I would not want to lose my title, or my career for that matter, because someone else was unprofessional. Therefore instant replay would be fine with me.Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:44:25 GMT | Crabstyle
Comment
So how exactly would this incident have been avoided by instant replay? Are these people stupid? Yeah, maybe a replay would/could aide in overturning the result, but it's not going to prevent a knockout punch from an eye-poke that was missed. What are they going to do, have some kid with a towel throw something into the octagon if the ref misses something? This is a perfect example of just how stupid and out of proportion things can get and how poorly analyzed a situation is before someone starts **bleep**ing.Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:49:28 GMT | GeoQuinIV
Comment
I go with the extra ref's outside the ring or cage. You are talking about 2 count them, "2" different incidences in how many 100's of fights? Duh!! s@?t happens. The next thing the pansy wansies will want is to have the hands wrapped in cotton 5 or 6 inchs thick. I beleive in protecting the fighters, to an extent. Each one of these guys know what they are getting into when they step into that cage. It's not an easy living, but it pays REAL well.Just leave them alone.
waktasha
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:53:53 GMT | Sludgedog
Comment
It's as GeoQuinIV says, "So how exactly would this incident have been avoided by instant replay?" It's only application is to penalize a fighter after the fact. People need to remember that this isn't boxing, MMA fighters are using open-fingered gloves. That means that accidentally getting poked in the eye happens from time to time. Usually if you get poked in the eye or kicked in the scrote, you can signal the ref and get time to recover and get it checked out. Stopping a fight to review an incident would ruin the sport. If they want to use it, then review tape while the fight goes on as normal and ask the fighter at the end of the round if he want to assess a penalty, if one in fact did occur. ComcastSports posts the dumbest articles.Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:10:42 GMT | wartman
Comment
These fruits beat each other by day and pork each other at night.Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:10:39 GMT | Mikeee