Vito's View
Don’t Blame George for Yankees Empire, Blame Bud
By Vito Forlenza
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:50:38 GMT
As the Yankees piled on one another in the infield like Little Leaguers (minus the free shirts and hats) and later doused each other in champagne like frat guys (minus the goggles) – all in celebration of the franchise’s latest World Series championship – the rest of the baseball world turned away in disgust. Listen to any sports talk radio show today, read some blogs, visit a few message boards and I promise that you’ll meet plenty of people dismissing New York’s 27th title. The refrain is as familiar as it is constant: Of course, the Yankees won. They spent $200 million. They bought their championship. It’s not fair.
Evidently, they completely disagree with Derek Jeter’s assessment: "This is right back where it belongs," he said of the World Series trophy he held in his arms after last night’s clincher.
This is about the point where Lee nearly threw up on the Yankee Stadium field.
This is about the point where even the most levelheaded baseball fan calls Jeter a jerk for rubbing it in.
But this is also the point where, as a Yankees fan, I become an apologist. This is where I jump up and defend the team that I spent every summer with since, well, as long as I can remember. And believe me, it wasn’t fun taking all those licks when the organization was a joke in the mid-to-late ’80s and early ’90s.
My main defense of the Yankees has always rested on a single contention: Don’t blame the Yankees, blame Major League Baseball.
Some Yankees fans believe that money doesn’t guarantee championships. Of course it doesn’t guarantee championships. But let’s be honest, it helps … tremendously. The Yankees have the money to build a $1.5 billion ballpark, stand up their own TV network and sell a global brand.
But most importantly, they have the money to make mistakes. Money allows you to hit big just as it allows you to miss big.
Sure, they spent a combined $423.5 million on CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Mark Teixeira last offseason. And that’s in addition to the $275 million deal they handed A-Rod the offseason before. And all of that’s in addition to the $189 million deal they awarded Jeter nine years ago and the big money they’ve given Rivera, Posada, Damon and Matsui.
But since their last championship in 2000, the Yankees have also made a host of head-scratching trades and signings for players who couldn’t deliver a championship: Carl Pavano, Kevin Brown, Randy Johnson, Jeff Weaver, Kei Igawa, Esteban Loaiza, Bobby Arbeu, Raul Mondesi, Ivan Rodriguez – the list is seemingly endless.
"This is what the Steinbrenner family has strived for, year after year," Joe Girardi said after winning his first World Series as a manager.
Indeed. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t. Either way, I can’t jump up and down and claim that money doesn’t buy hardware. It does everything but. I’m on your side of that squabble.
What I won’t buy is the argument that the Yankees are this evil empire that’s swimming in Benjamins, crushing the little guy and making a mockery of the game by giving big contracts to the best players.
That’s not the Yankees’ fault. That’s baseball’s fault. Don’t blame George Steinbrenner. Blame Bud Selig.
Instead of instituting a salary cap to achieve competitive balance, baseball decided to focus on revenue sharing and a luxury tax (which is a euphuism for a penalty on high payrolls).
Against that backdrop are the Yankees, a franchise making the most money but also willing to spend the most money. By declining to set a salary cap, baseball has handed the Yankees (and everyone else) that right.
What do you expect the Yankees to do … not spend their money?
We have plenty of owners taking that route. They act as if they can’t afford top-tier free agents because they are already begging on the street corner trying to keep their franchises afloat.
As a fan, you want your team to win at all costs. And that’s exactly what the Yankees do.
They spare no expense in building a winner. To expect them to hoard their money and limit their spending because it would be better for some other team to get certain players who can then beat the Yankees and keep them from winning a championship is ludicrous.
But that’s exactly what Yankee-haters demand. They insist that the Yankees should take it upon themselves to restrict their spending … all for the good of the game. I’ll tell you what’s good for the game – good Yankees teams that attract huge crowds on the road and drive up TV ratings. That’s good for the game.
And that’s exactly why baseball doesn’t want a salary cap. They want the Yankees to be good. They want the Yankees in the playoffs. They want them to reach the World Series.
Baseball knows that you’ll watch when the Yankees are among the elite, that you’ll smile when they lose and you’ll fume when they win.
You might cringe when watching the Yankees celebrate another championship and you might feel nauseated this winter when hearing them talk about doing it again next year.
But your rage shouldn’t center on the Yankees. It should focus on baseball – and the broken system it created. The Yankees weren’t alone in building this empire. Baseball enabled them and assisted them … every step of the way.
Your Feedback |
Email me at vitosview@comcast.net; follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/vjforlenza.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
Message Edited by Vito_Forlenza on 11-06-2009 09:03 AM
Comment
Buy a championship or take advantage of the rules? I will opt for taking advantage of the rules. I used to be a devoted fan of one particular MLB team. But the Yankees gave outrageous salaries to the players and the men for whom they traded and other teams couldn't catch up. Of course I fumed at the Yankees. But mostly I was irate at MLB for allowing one team, whether I liked that team or not, to be so dominating. I frankly prefer a bit more competition and MLB should take itself by the scruff of the neck and shake the h--- out of itself for allowing such a situation to arise. Set some reasonable rules, Selig and company, stop being so unfair. Control the drug use and control the spending.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:31:15 GMT | PAGramz
Comment
The Yankees did not do anything different than say the Red Sox, the Orioles, the Blue Jays, ect. Look at the Red Sox, they paid 100 million just to TALK to Dice-K. An average picture at best. He won 18 games two years ago only because the Red Sox offence kept bailing him out!. The Orioles spend money like they own the printing machine, only they make bad choices. The name of the game today is :I'll play fore you-pay me my price:.The Yankees made mistakes, but this year they did it right, they bet on Sabathia/Burnett/Teixeira, the Red Sox bet on Smoltz/Penny. Dice-K, for all the mony paid to him, didn't even show up to play, he had a "Tired arm". If I made his money, I be dammed sure I stayed in shape.
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:34:13 GMT | yankeebrnxboy
Comment
No different than th NBA lakers. They've been buying titles for years.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:42:22 GMT | jtbcs02
Comment
Yankees are DISGUSTING!!!it is ALL about the money & cheating (DRUGS)... so in reality this title should have an asterisk next to it, b'cuz it is NOT a real title won by true pure baseball!!!
i guess what they say about cheater never wins is FALSE...
it really is a SHAME for baseball (& any other sports for that matter)!!!
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:46:28 GMT | txtwister
Comment
Anyone whining that the Yankees are buying championships and manipulating rules need to shut it.I HATE the Yankees - and have been a Cubs fan all my life...
and guess what... the Cubs have one of the highest payrolls in the Majors, yet still can't produce!!!
As deep as my hate goes for the Yankees, I wish the Cubbies had that kind of dedicated ownership - set on winning titles instead of the sole purpose of a healthy bottom line.
I know its a business, but you're also in the business to win.
Congrats to the Yanks - and if Jim Hendry is reading this, maybe take some notes from the Steinbrenners. It may do you some good!
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:51:27 GMT | dbarton02
Comment
Hey baseball fans! What is it that we do when we watch baseball?A. punch a time clock,
B. go long in the market, or
C. GET DRUNK, PARTY, AND CHEER FOR OUR FAVORITE TEAM!!!!!!!!!
My point is, that it doesn't matter if the Yanks spent alot money on players. So if you didn't answer A or B then maybe "it is what it is" and you should just kick back, relax and enjoy the game. That's why we have baseball.
yours truly,
Chicago
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:57:34 GMT | russ2009
Comment
The Yankees aren"t the only ones to spend a truck load of money.How about the Mets ,Boston & others who are low key. Don't forget many of the Yankees were home grown. The Yankee haters ? Sour grapesThu, 05 Nov 2009 19:58:10 GMT | mariec3
Comment
Jealousy does NOT become you...Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:58:32 GMT | seenitall
Comment
I would buy the arguement about attendance and ratings if they were actually high. Who watched that game last night- Yankee fans and Philly fans- not the rest of the country. Compare it to how many watch a meaningless NFL game- The ratings for the San Diego Denver game a few weeks back on Monday night more than doubled the baseball game.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:00:27 GMT | duncato
Comment
Baseball needs a cap but teams need to be able to keep and pay their home grown players. Kids should be able to grow up watching their players without fear that rosters will continue to be rotating doors. The Phils have a high payroll but the core of their talent is their own and they should be able to keep it.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:05:20 GMT | trebor27
Comment
I blame Major League Baseball completely. It is almost impossible for small market teams to compete with the large market teams. Every year the Pirates, Royals, Reds, struggle financially to compete. They often are forced to sell off their best assets (players), in order to pay the bills. Large market teams like New York, Los Angeles, Boston, and Chicago, pay mega dollars to get the best players. It doesn't always work out, as the Mets can attest to that. The bigger problem is that the same teams will be at the top each year, and small market teams have one losing season after another. I grew up on baseball, still love the game, but rarely go anymore. I want to see the star players on my team. The problem is the star players are all playing for the opponent. Until something is done to level the playing field I don't see how small market teams will ever compete.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:06:12 GMT | mcdman1074
Comment
Yes, jealousy is a powerful emotion... Attention Hater: If the owners of the teams you love had the revenue to buy the best baseball players, they'd be the first in line for the bidding..Who are you kidding? Get over it,as you can't do a **bleep** thing about it...Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:09:06 GMT | MHINTL
Comment
Most baseball fans agree....you get what you pay for. Marlins spend little and get little results. Yanks spend plenty and get 27 championships. I am tired of all these cry baby fans of teams who do not get any players and have boring teams playing for a championship. I love the Yanks and I love the Marlins.....I believe you get what you spend on. As for buying championships, well lets see how about those **bleep** lakers and cowboys or steelers and other franchises whom their leagues get a hard on for to win it all. I say its about **bleep** time the Yanks win again and hope they do it again next year. Spend right and get results. Be cheap and get a perenial 2nd place team every year. Oh and how much was the payroll of those phillies?Team 2008 payroll 2009 payroll
Yankees $209,081,577 $201,449,189
Mets $137,793,376 $149,373,987
Cubs $118,345,833 $134,809,000
Red Sox $133,390,035 $121,745,999
Tigers $137,685,196 $115,085,145
Angels $119,216,333 $113,709,000
Phillies $98,269,880 $113,004,046
Astros $88,930,414 $102,996,414
Dodgers $118,588,536 $100,414,592
Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:10:43 GMT | fas97_2009
Comment
You're right on both counts: they do buy championships, and they do take advantage of the rules. You're right about who to blame. Baseball makes it impossible to have an Arizona Cardinals, Atlanta Hawks, or Chicago Black Hawks who can claw their way back into relevancy. Look at the Pirates: 17 straight losing seasons. Are you kidding me? That's why I haven't watched an MLB game in years. Well that, and steroids, and corked bats, and 1994, and.... It's not now, and may never be, a competitive playing field. But the Yankees deserve everything they get.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:17:18 GMT | dallasdriller
Comment
of course they bought the championship, no different than other big market teams (except more $$$), shame on mlb for allowing this to take place. small market teams have a short window of opportunity to win before losing the talent that they devolped to big market teams.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:18:35 GMT | rags1
Comment
The Phillies paroll is half of what the Yankees is. BTW, even with spending half the amount, having no closer, 1 strong starting picther and a depleted bullpen we still made it to the WS and took it to game 6. We will be there next year too, because we have a bunch of guys who really love to play & they actually really like one another. See you next year!!!Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:18:56 GMT | stevesgirlz
Comment
The Mets have one of the highest payrolls in MLB and what did it get them? I don't hear anyone complaining when the ballparks in the so-called small market cities are sold out when they play the Yankees. The Yankees have, and make, the money to spend. It is the same as any company putting the profits ba the company.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:24 GMT | PecksBadBoy
Comment
I am not a Yankees fan so I didn't watch the the series. But I say congrats to the Yanks and Steinbrenner for buying another world series.Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:20:51 GMT | cou351
Comment
I was 12 yrs old when they built the Angel Stadium, and all of OC was thrilled with our new team. We did not win for decades. Now we are getting the pennent, and even a world series. We are the OC Angels, not LA, we are not in LA. OC fans have paid for the tickets and merchandise from the beginning. The YANKS have $$$$$$$and the best team. I agree it should be like the NFL, but the Angels are making money now, and I would not mind if they spent the money on more talent, and a World Series winning team!Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:22:15 GMT | BeachGirl7