Vito's View
What are Oklahoma and Florida Playing For?
By Vito Forlenza
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:39:07 GMT
It’s all set. The last two Heisman Trophy Winners. Two of the most dynamic offenses in college football. The champions of the season’s top conferences.
After weeks of hype, the BCS national championship game is ready to kick off as the top two teams in the country get to go at it for...absolutely nothing.
Oh, it looks like it’s going to be a great college football game. Oklahoma and Florida should entertain us for three-and-a-half hours. And when it’s all over, either the Sooners or the Gators will hoist the crystal football and scream through the confetti and into the TV cameras, “We’re No. 1!”
But are they?
Of course not.
The BCS national championship game is just another postseason exhibition. It does not determine the best team in college football.
That may be on what the BCS is selling, but every year, fewer and fewer people are buying it...or even watching it.
Still, the college presidents, the bowl officials, and TV executives insist on destroying everything about college football’s postseason. We all know that we need a playoff, and we all know that a playoff isn’t happening any time soon. (ESPN’s analysts used to yell and scream about the need for a playoff, but now that the network bought the BCS rights until 2014, it’s easy to wonder if they’ll suddenly hail the BCS as the perfect system for a deciding a national champ.)
But beyond muddling the national title picture, they’ve also managed to absolutely wipe out the once-rich tradition of New Year’s Day bowl games. The first day of the year used to be all about college football. Now, thanks to the BCS and a few “brilliant” TV producers, it’s tough to know which games are played on that day.
Years ago, no sport would dream of trying to compete with college football for eyeballs on Jan. 1. But the bowl system is so diluted and the games so spread out that the NHL—the NHL!—is staging a Winter Classic to go head-to-head with college football...and it’s succeeding.
Other sports are sure to follow. And why not? There are millions of people sitting home all day, too tired to do much because they were out late the night before. It’s a perfect day to capture the nation’s attention—and now it’s even more appealing because those who run college football weren’t smart enough to keep it.
So we have two problems: a broken system for deciding a national champion and a broken tradition that is in dire need of restoration.
But beyond our needs—you know the needs of the fans that have long been forgotten—this setup is completely unfair to the people who really matter in all of this...and who are equally forgotten.
The kids.
Yes, I’m serious.
Now, I know these kids get a free education, and get to play in front of millions every week, and are treated like rock stars on campus. Still, the system is completely unfair to them.
This may have been evident after the 2003 season when USC and LSU were forced to split the national title.
It may have been evident after the 2004 season when unbeaten Auburn was locked out of the national title game...yet for some reason didn’t get a share of the title.
But it has never been more evident than today.
As I watched USC dismantle Penn State in the Rose Bowl, I couldn’t help but feel sorry for the Trojans. Even though they were beating up on my beloved alma mater, I couldn’t stop thinking about how the system robbed these kids of the chance to play for the championship.
Though they could have put up 60 on an opponent that came in at 11-1—and believe me, they would have put up 60 if Pete Carroll didn’t hold Joe Paterno in such high regard—there’s no way for the 12-1 Trojans to win an outright title.
The next night, I watched Utah embarrass Alabama in the Sugar Bowl to finish 13-0, and I felt the same empathy for the Utes. They were hammering an opponent that came in at 12-1 and was ranked No. 1 for a good part of the season. And yet an outright championship isn’t even a possibility for the lone unbeaten in major college football.
And then there’s Texas. As I watched Texas gut out a comeback win over Ohio State in the Fiesta Bowl, I wondered: Has there ever been a team that was robbed by the system more than Texas?
Even though the ‘Horns beat Oklahoma in October, the BCS rated the Sooners as the better team. That meant that that Oklahoma, and not Texas, got to play in the Big 12 title game (because Big 12 officials ridiculously decided to give the BCS some credibility and use it as a tie-breaker), which paved the way for Oklahoma, and not Texas, to reach the national title game.
There’s no way for the 12-1 Longhorns to win the outright national title.
Know who else is being robbed? Oklahoma and Florida.
They were the lucky pair that was selected to face off in the BCS national championship game, but few believe they truly belong. Why? Because, like me, people are angry that too made kids got burned by the process.
And all those kids who play in the so-called minor bowl games get robbed, too. The system has all but announced that their games don’t matter in the least. Most get jobbed a second time by stupid bowl officials and TV execs who believe that playing games on any day other than New Year's Day is the best way to attract more viewers. It does affect viewership, just not in the direction they were hoping.
As I’ve written in this space time and again, the BCS doesn't solve a thing. It just spreads the notion of a mythical national champion and creates an anticlimactic end to an otherwise exhilarating college football season.
The argument that the BCS is better than its processors, the Bowl Coalition and the Bowl Alliance, because it sets matchups they could not is complete nonsense. Replacing one flawed system with another is hardly an accomplishment.
I don’t care if Sam Bradford and Oklahoma beat Florida by three touchdowns, or if Tim Tebow and the Gators hang half-a-hundred on the Sooners. Neither should be crowned national champions. Because there’s nothing, absolutely nothing, that makes either team any better than USC, Utah, or Texas.
The BCS was “established to determine a national champion while maintaining and enhancing the bowl system.”
It has proved, yet again, that it can’t do either.
Are Oklahoma and Florida playing for a legitimate title? Who should be No. 1? Click here to comment.
Message Edited by Vito_Forlenza on 01-07-2009 12:02 PM
Comment
Utah is undefeated. end of it. what is so stinkin' difficult about setting up a college play-off? the top 8 teams at the end of the season are your contenders and those play-offs games are the bowl games.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:08:41 GMT | saltydawg
Comment
I've often asked the question, but never received a logical answer. Maybe someone reading this can provide one. All I hear is that we can not have a playoff because it would ruin the bowl system. Well why can't we incorporate the two? Take the top 8 or 12 or however many teams we decide upon and put them in a playoff. The first round of playoff games is the Sugar, Fiesta, Orange, Rose, whatever. The next round is comprised of some others. The final game is just that, the BCS championship game. That way, the bowls actually mean something again. As it stands now all they do is add to the malaise. By incorporating them in the championship decision process, they offer some interest and meaning to both the teams and the fans. Bowls that are not part of the series now can still be played - sort of an NIT for football. That way, the few people who are interested in the Mienke Bowl or the Motor City Bowl or whatever can still have them and they will still draw the lowly ratings they get now - or maybe even better who knows.The main point is that we can have a true national champion just like in every other collegiate sport because just like the ALL the others (including D1A, D2 etc - sorry I can't swallow this Subdivision crap any more than I can the current BCS system).
If someone can tell me why this doesn't make sense, please do. Thanks
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:17:00 GMT | ansilco
Comment
Oh, for those who think that the bowl folks would have a problem with who gets in which round (ie does the Sugar Bowl go in the first round and the Fiesta in the semi finals) they can rotate it each year. For those bowls that are not part of the playoff - you're meaningless now, so what's the big deal.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:20:09 GMT | ansilco
Comment
Vito,Give it up.
It doesn't matter what system is used there can never be a true national champ for a number of reasons. For example, if USC was playing in the game this Thursday night, which team would show up? The USC team that got beat by Oregon State or the team that won 11 games? Due to injuries, illness or a key player just having a bad day there could be a different USC team in every game they play.
Any of the top five teams could beat any of the other teams on different days due to all the above.
What I plan to do is watch a great game played by the Gators and the Sooners. Who knows which team will win. There could be a different result if they played again next week!
Relax Vito, and enjoy the game.
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:18:31 GMT | Shaka
Comment
There must be several hundred, if not a few thousand, colleges with football teams in conferences all over the country, most of which the majority of us have never heard of, until, like Boise St., for example, they come up with an undefeated season featuring an opponent or two ranked in the top 25. College football seasons feature too few games to ensure a good measure of pitting conferences against a number of other conferences. Florida, OK, USC, Texas, Utah would need to play at least two, three or four teams from each of the other major conferences in addition to all the teams in their own conference. But, what would determine the threshold separating the major and minor conferences? Recognizing that the only constant in the universe is change, what measure would be applied to graduate a minor conference to major status, or vice versa?
Likely, as with so many other aspects of daily life, there is no perfect solution to the quandary, but it seems there could at least be a better one than what we have now. Living in Florida and having a life in an area with "year around beautiful weather", I don't have much of an opportunity to see many great teams from other distant parts of the country. As an avid Gator fan, Florida will be my #1 after the game tomorrow night, win or lose. My solution is to sit back, pop a couple cold ones and have a great time watching the game. My pick is Florida by 10 points. I'm sure the outcome of this game won't change the mind of any avid Trojan, Ute, Longhorn, Sooner, or CMU Eagle fan either. I really would love to see the Gators go up against any or all of the above, but it probably wouldn't change which team is "my team."
Stats, rankings, all of it is kind of useless in guaging which team is absolutely the #1 team in the nation, particularly in college football. Just about anything can happen with any team facing another on a college gridiron on any given day. My advice is, don't sweat it and have a great time supporting your team. Sooner or later, perhaps when the conference, TV and BCS contracts run out, some change will come around. Will it actually be the perfect solution, whatever it is? I really doubt it.
In other words, Shaka, ditto.
Message Edited by bayou on 01-07-2009 03:33 PM
Message Edited by bayou on 01-07-2009 03:38 PM
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:29:11 GMT | bayou
Comment
Utah is 13-0. They were a 10 point underdog to Alabama. They won by 14 points (31-17). That is a difference of 24 points between what the "experts" thought they would score and what they did score. To say that Utah could not beat Florida or Oklahoma is buying into the same rationale that made them a 10 point underdog to Alabama, which has been proved wrong! I'm not saying Utah WILL WIN, but I am saying that others saying Utah WILL LOSE are just as wrong as the prediction Utah would lose the Sugar Bowl by 10.The only way to truly recognize a National Champion is a playoff. The regular season would provide the seeding for the playoffs. Eight, Ten, Twelve or Sixteen team playoff, it doesn't matter. Then the final rankings determine who goes to which bowl to start the playoff process.
The only thing that has to happen - HAS to happen - is eliminating the automatic berths. That way you won't have No. 22 or No. 24 playing in a BCS bowl game. If they are that low in the rankings, do they deserve a BCS bowl game? Just because they are in a BCS conference with an automatic berth?
A playoff system lets the teams decide who is No. 1, not sportscasters, coaches, computers, or whoever. That is the way it should be.
Utah is No. 1. (13-0)
The winner of the "Championship" game between Florida (12-1) & Oklahoma (12-1), can argue with Texas Tech (13-1), and USC (13-1) No. 2, 3, and 4. The loser of the "Championship" should be No. 5.
Message Edited by mikeg1956 on 01-07-2009 03:39 PM
Message Edited by mikeg1956 on 01-07-2009 03:42 PM
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:35:02 GMT | mikeg1956
Comment
Vito, you are 100% correct in everything you say. I think 99% of America would like to see a playoff (1% are the ones receiving the big payoffs and therefore like the BCS setup). However, it is NOT going to change unless the majority of fans stop watching these games all together. Then the sponsorships and monies dry up fast. I personally am NOT going to watch the game nor even care who wins. It starts with one person and I plan to help that cause. When asked the next day about the game....I will say "what game?". It's a joke and the folks that run it are ruining a great game. Now you and I both know this will not happen so we have to keep counting on people like you to shout out the injustices in your columns. Keep up the good work.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:36:26 GMT | FootballFan31
Comment
A playoff system is required. Each year seems to demand it, but especially so this year. Utah is undefeated and defeated Alabama. USC beat a very good Penn State. And on and on.I doubt I will watch the so-called championship game. I didn't watch it last year. And to put one together using the major bowls would be so easy a caveman could do it.
If the smaller schools can do it, surely the big guys can.
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:44:32 GMT | SNAFU
Comment
Hey Shaka - you must be from the SEC. Using your logic...if a loss precludes you from natl champ consideration, only one team should be in the National Champsionship game...Utah, apparently playing an intrasquad game against the practice team.You say that USC has one loss, therefore they don't belong. Well then, neither do OK or FL.
Every great team loses. If that were not the case, the last 2 playable Super Bowls would have been in 1972 and 2007, when the Dolphins and Patriots ran the table and went undefeated.
The great teams in NFL history...the 1950's and 60's Packers, 1970's Steelers, 1980's 49ers, 90's Cowboys, 00's Patriots were all icons of their era. Guess what, none of them went undefeated. They all had the occasional hiccup. Does that diminish their greatness?
USC had one bad half against Oregon State to account for their loss. Texas had ONE BAD PLAY at the end of the Texas Tech game to account for their loss. Penn State's 1 loss was by 1 point.
Having one bad half, one bad play or not being able to score one more field goal in the right game should not negate you from the national title picture.
Hey, here's an idea...let's develop a playoff system!
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:47:38 GMT | USCalum
Comment
The winner of the Oklahoma vrs Florida will be playing for a share of the National Title in my opinion. I have no ties to Utah but after watching them take apart Alabama in the Sugar Bowl they left little doubt in my mind they could compete at any level. As for a playoff system the big boys at the top of the ladder will never allow that to happen, they will always take one of the so called 8 elite teams with a loss over a undefeated team whatever conference they come from and by the way what makes Oklahoma so special every year, they lost the last two Fiesta Bowls and got their head handed to them on a platter last year by WVU, everybody seems to have forgotten about that. How about the Buckeyes and Nittany Lions and their conference, they are now 1-6 in bowl games, same old story every time they get out of conference. And hurray for Notre Dame as well, finally got a bowl win after 14 years and got invited to a bowl with 6 wins. I got pretty tired of Game Day with Kirk and Lee as well, they jump on the same old band wagons every year and always have to eat crow when the bowls are over but next year is just around the corner and they will start off next year with same old top ten teams as always. The ACC is now dominated by teams that jumped over from the Big East, so much for they can't compete. The so called experts at ESPN are in bad need of a total re-do and we need someone at the desk who does not have a bias every season. All this same o same o every year get older every season.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:48:08 GMT | Wolf_1
Comment
Shaka - I do agree with you on one thing. We should all just sit back and enjoy the game for what it is...well said. We can't change it (this year at least) and it will be a great battle against 2 powerhouses of football, great players and lots of drama.Even though my team is not in it, I will enjoy it nonetheless!
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:51:55 GMT | USCalum
Comment
No, they are not playing for a LEGITIMATE title. As long as sportscaster voting and nerd-driven computers drive the ranking process, it's still a beauty contest and it always will be until there's a playoff.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:58:24 GMT | MICKJAGGER
Comment
Congratulations for being 13-0 but look at the schedule you play. Certainly not Oklahoma/Texas caliber.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:10:42 GMT | LoboMom
Comment
Obviously, like everbody else, a playoff system is the perfect idea in my mind. Even so, I highly doubt that that would happen anytime soon. If your not oging to do that, then here's just a temporary idea. Don't have the nat'l championship at first. Only pick the teams for the nat'l championship AFTER all bowls have been played. If this were the case, then the nat'l championship would have either Utah, USC, or Texas playing against each other. They could just have Florida and Oklahoma play in the Orange Bowl instead(get the ACC and Big East out of the Orange Bowl, and this is coming from a Miami Hurricanes fan). Like other people have said, stop it with the automatic bids. Just put the best teams in the BCS bowls. I didn't even make an attempt to watch the Orange Bowl this year because why waste my time watching Va Tech vs. Cincinnati in a BCS bowl. Georgia should have been in a BCS bowl instead of Cincinnati. Then after seeing all of the bowls, the voters could see who are the best two teams(which would have been Utah vs. USC or Texas). The only reason college football doesn't want teams like Utah and Boise State playing in the nat'l championship is because they are not big market teams. Florida and Oklahoma are big market teams which they think would attract more viewers but for the past few years, it has back-fired including this year. It's the same way with every sport. The MLB probably loved it when the Yankees played the Mets in the World Series because it's all New York which will give them a ton of exposure. Also the NFL wishes the Cowboys played in every Super Bowl(that would be a nightmare).Message Edited by fsusucks3 on 01-07-2009 04:42 PM
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:34:18 GMT | fsusucks3
Comment
The BCS is a total joke and I have not and will not watch another bowl game until this silly system is replaced.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:34:40 GMT | 1Towman1
Comment
Money! I can't help avoiding the idea that money is the driving factor in the all too numerous bowls played every year. Schools must get plenty from the current system. I believe that a playoff system can be just as lucrative if not more. It will also bring integrity back to the end of season fiasco. Without the money issue, I think everybody would stop talking about initiating a playoff system and just do it.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:45:34 GMT | tatonka
Comment
Vito you are spot on. And this is why over the last few years I have not been watching the bowl games. In the old days I would spend New Years day nursing my hang over and watching football. The games are meaningless.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:50:30 GMT | boval
Comment
There will not be a playoff due to the money. You cannot use the existing bowl system as it would be impossible to get the alumni to travel to 3 or 4 games across the country. A bowl game now for one person runs upwards of $1K per person when hotel, airfare, meals and tickets are taken into account. The average fan cannot afford this.The only way to do it would be to have the top seeded teams play in their home stadiums. Doing this would eliminate the current bowl games and diminish their revenue. While the theory is good for college football and good for the fans to watch on TV, it would be bad for the fans who would like to travel to the games. Do you spend your nut on the first playoff game or the gamble that your team will make it to the NC game?
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:59:08 GMT | BuckeyeInFla
Comment
They should be called "Bowl Champions". There will never be a true national champion without a playoff.Wed, 07 Jan 2009 22:13:28 GMT | Jon2002