Russakoff Rules
A Vote for USC Is a Vote for Change
By Lee Russakoff
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:38:16 GMT
America, we have sat through season upon season of corruption, tyranny, and illegitimate champions. Many are convinced that such uncertainty is our fate. Many believe we can't change the greed and exploitation that has taken over college football. I'm here to tell you: Yes we can.
All it's going to take is the faith and commitment of a few voters.
I don’t have a vote in the AP Top 25 poll for college football. But I have a request for all that do:
Vote USC No. 1
…or Utah
…or Texas.
Just don’t vote for the winner of Florida-Oklahoma. Doing so endorsees all that is wrong with college football.
The BCS is a joke. I know it. You know it. Rachel Glandorf knows it. (How in the world did Colt McCoy pull that?)
No sport crowns its champion with voters and computers…unless you consider figure skating a sport. And I know you don't. I certainly don’t.
No matter what the computers tell us, we all know the winner of this “championship” game is no more of a champion than USC or Texas or Utah. Hell, even Vito knows it.
We all know it, and the conference bigwigs don’t care that we know it. They make money this way…and that’s all that matters.
The only way to exact change is to hit these guys in the pocketbook. We need to make this “BCS Championship Game” completely irrelevant. And the way to do that is for you AP writers to NOT make the BCS Championship winner No. 1.
Think about it. If the BCS Championship Game consistently fails to give us the AP champion, how much longer will it really matter? And if it doesn’t matter, how many people are going to keep watching it? And if people stop watching it, what company in its right mind is going to pay top-dollar to advertise for it.
It’s all about the money for these guys…so let’s take their money. Yes we can.
We’re already tipping that way. I’ve never spoken to so many people—so many college football fans—who don’t care about the BCS Championship Game. Universally, they all believe Oklahoma-Florida will be a great football game…and universally, they all could care less about watching it.
The murkiness of the ’08 season has made a consensus No. 1 impossible under the current system. Oklahoma-Florida will be a great game, but it won’t answer the question we all want answered. It won’t tell us who the best team in the country is.
Putting the Oklahoma-Florida winner atop the AP poll, however, props up this asinine system and gives it a modicum of legitimacy it doesn’t deserve.
AP voters have a chance…a rare chance…to help change this sport for the better. A vote for the Oklahoma-Florida winner is a vote of confidence for the current system. A vote for USC, Utah, or Texas is a vote for change.
Stand up and vote for change, writers.
There are those who say the system will never change. Doubters doomed to believe that things can never get better.
But where we are met with cynicism and doubt and fear and those who tell us that we can't, we will respond with that timeless creed that sums up the spirit of the American people in three simple words...
Yes, we can (get a college football playoff).
Yes we can, sports fans.
God bless you and God bless the United States of America.
Should the winner of Florida-Oklahoma be ranked No. 1? If there was a playoff, who would win it? Will college football ever have an eight-team playoff? Sound off here.
Message Edited by Lee_Russakoff on 01-08-2009 02:18 PM
Comment
AMEN! NOW IF PEOPLE WILL JUST LISTEN!!!!!Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:50:51 GMT | BOOTGUY
Comment
It is simply very simple anyway you may want to slice it, excuse it, dice it again, and toss it like a salad......UTAH is the true NUMBER ONE and deservedly so.I've coached at and played at the college level and yet being a died in the wool SC fan I have to give it to UTAH as does anyone being sane.......They were perfect.....they did not have to make ANY EXCUSE regardless------ and if you see it that way you are thinking rationally if not, truly, you are a **bleep** or plainly do not have the ability to uderstand or comprehend the game. * (Possibly due to bias you do not have the ability due to lack of valid rational, to get past really accepting the truth of what it is. I will give you that but will not buy into it.)
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:51:59 GMT | SoIAmIRightOn
Comment
I'm sorry Utah played an outstanding game and beat Alabama and that was awesome but that does not make them #1. Once again this shows why we need a playoff system. ABSOLUTELY the #1 should go to USC and no I did not go to School there. Just watch them play - it doesn' take a genius. I'm a Penn State Fan and I believe SC should be the #1.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:55:51 GMT | kiana
Comment
How completely irresponsible to encourage people to punish the 100+ student athletes that are playing in the championship game this year. I fully endorse a college playoff system and think the current BCS system is criminal. However, none of the Sooner or Gator players deserve to have their accomplishment this year belittled through a campaign that will not result in change. Find a better way.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:09:39 GMT | ThoughtfulVoter
Comment
Kiana....Who did USC lose to again??? Oh yeah and who did Utah beat again??? That's right Oregon State. Of course you want USC to be the best in the land to make it look like your lions aren't as crappy as SC proved they were. True national champs....UTAH!
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:10:28 GMT | UtahMan
Comment
USC, UF, OU, and UT are great teams but they all lost 1 game. Utah is unbeaten. In the wacky system called the BCS that is supposed to mean something....that is as long as you a member of the so called elite conferences. This year screams like no other that a playoff is required. I would love to see the AP writers finally do something correct and vote for anyone other than tonight's winner.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:14:58 GMT | keith1623
Comment
The BCS system is a farce and everyone knows it. The continual lame excuses for why there can't be a playoff don't pass muster. Virtuall every other college championship is decided by a playoff. The BCS has no credibility. It's not a scheduling issue when coolege teams finish their season at the end of November then sit around for a month to play a bowl game. Why are those in power afraid to stage a playoff that would generate and enormous amount of interest and advertising revenue dollars in the millions? It makes no sense and I don't want to hear that this is about the academic challenges this presents for student-athletes. That is laughable and as ridiculous as the whole BCS debacle.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:15:18 GMT | limb
Comment
I THINK THE TIE BREAKER SHOULD BE THE SCHOOL WITH THE HIGHEST GRADUATION RATE SHOULD WIN. COLLEGE SPORTS ARE A JOKE AND JUST A MONEY MAKER. HOW MANY OF THE RETARDED PLAYERS CAN EVEN READ WRITE OR SPEAK ENGLISH???Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:18:18 GMT | Hall
Comment
It's only a week into 2009 and I already can't stand the absolute bastardization of Yes We Can.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:20:26 GMT | ian_mcallister
Comment
NO! Texas and Utah didn't earn it! Oklahoma should be the national champions. You cannot rank 135(off the top of my head) teams by standings! Utah didn't play real teams, they played chumps. Since schools choose their own schedules, the BCS had to factor in strength of schedule so they would play teams at THEIR level. Oklahoma beat real teams, utah didn't. Texas should have just won all their games so this wouldn't be a problem. Don't blame the system, blame Utah for choosing a chump schedule and Texas for choking!Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:25:44 GMT | eh___
Comment
I agree with myself and yes my typing sucks and I said a double positive. It's the presidents of the schools that keep the bcs around. Follow the money, you will find the rat.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:28:02 GMT | Hall
Comment
Here we are once again and the mighty usc is not in the "big game". So, usc declares something wrong with the BCS. Admit it, usc is not #1 material nor any other team in the pac 10. Oregon State plays outside the pac 10 to get better. usc should take on more worthy opponents. When I was a youngster, the usc and Notre Dame game was huge......not any more. usc, stop living in the past.......change your padded schedule.........earn the #1 spot.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:28:06 GMT | soccerdmk
Comment
Now that is just ridiculous to down size both Oklahoma and Florida for their accomplishments. Yes USC, Utah, and Texas are great teams, but USC lost to an unranked team (Oregon State), you cant ignor that fact. Utah does not have the tough schedule as most, yes they beat Alabama but Alabama lost Smith before the game and were coming from a tough fought lost to Florida. Texas, in my oppinion it should have been Oklahoma and Texas in the Big 12 Championship because Missouri had 3 loses coming into it. Russakoff I dont think its right for you take anything away from both Oklahoma and Florida, I think whoever wins should be number 1. Yes I want a playoff too, but don't blame these two teams for that. They both have extreme talent and deserve to be number 1. Russakoff, sorry but that was an idiotic blow at these two teams.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:28:24 GMT | soonerkid0491
Comment
The idea of making a claim that one team is The Best is what is crazy. OK v Fl wont decide it, but neither would playoffs. Someone will always be able to say that they should have had a chance, which is why we have USC, Utah, Texas, Florida and Oklahoma all saying that they are the best. There will always be teams who don't get a fair shake when seeded, or conferance rivals who are better than nearly anyone else in the country. Should every conferance get an automatic bid? That in effect is what Utah's AG is saying.Can the TV revenues really support a tournament without eroding regular conferance attendance and viewership? A football team is a lot more expensive to move around the country and house than a basketball team. And the Football tournament would need to be twice as long, so we are talking about months. In competition for air time with the NFL, and other sports. And finally, how does this potentially impact actual student atheletes? When both Fall and Spring semesters are interupted, how many fewer will graduate? The college presidents have to ask, even if many do not care about the answer. It certainly won't get any more of them drafted into the NFL.
The professionals need a set of final standings to order a draft, but colleges don't need it. And any thing with a winner and a story the gamblers and sportswriters will promote as "great for the sport". But where they see money, the Athletic Associations will go for it. The players have the least to gain, and the most to lose, but they are not the ones who will choose.
Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:28:47 GMT | Phil_Stone
Comment
You should check the schedule again. They ALL play chumps. Wasn't Alabama the SEC champs.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:30:11 GMT | Hall
Comment
that 11-2 penn st. team you called crappy has had 4 undefeated teams 1968-1969 -1973 and 1994 that went 46-0 and did not win titles because of idiots like you-so screw utah and bend over loser!Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:36:45 GMT | req
Comment
Someone name me one good team Utah faced besides Alabama? I can answer it, none! They are #6 at best in my books. Try putting them in the SEC or Big 12 for a couple of games, they would not last.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:36:53 GMT | soonerkid0491
Comment
everyone has to admit Utah completed their season in great style. They beat top rated teams to reach a bowl game, then beat a top rated team. The teams were rated by the ( B C S ). They should be in the runnung for no. 1.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:38:52 GMT | ballplayer
Comment
No Alabama was not the sec champ. They were beaten by florida for the sec championship.Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:41:57 GMT | ballplayer