Blinded by the Hype

Metallica Album Preview Cover-up?

By blindedbythehype
Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:38:28 GMT

Yesterday UK bloggers The Quietus posted a preview of the new Metallica album after hearing it at an invite-only session in London. Their coverage -- which you can still find here -- is a relatively fair piece that discusses the hardship of being a Metallica fan some twenty years after their epic, "...And Justice for All."

The Quietus contributor "Bob Mulhouse" is circumspect about the album's prospects, saying, "This album could be good, or it could be mediocre – too much depends on the other four songs to make a call at this point." Nothing out of the ordinary for a record review after a one-time listen.

It came as something of a surprise then to find that the internet had been expunged of any coverage of the event. We emailed The Quietus editor Luke Turner about what happened. He gave this response:

The story behind the removal of the article runs as follows: Metallica held an album listening party for selected music journalists in London this Wednesday past. One of the writers was kind enough to write a piece about the album which, if you were lucky enough to read it before it was taken down, was full of praise about a return to form. At no point was the writer ask[ed] to sign a non-disclosure agreement. The Quietus and other websites ran pieces on the album, but were quickly contacted by Metallica’s management via a third party and told to remove the articles. The Quietus kept our article up the longest and, as no non-disclosure agreement had been signed, [was] not prepared to remove it merely due to the demands of Metallica’s management. We only eventually removed the article earlier today to protect the professional interests of the writer concerned (the piece was written anonymously). Seems Metallica’s fear of the internet shows no sign of abating.
Interesting, huh? We're still waiting for comment from Metallica's camp, and will post their response when we receive it. Developing...

Related:


Message Edited by blindedbythehype on 06-06-2008 03:33 PM

Comment

Just another chapter of self-absorbed millionaire hicks from Fremont Ca. When are they going to realize that they are not the greatest band on earth and really, their music is mediocre at best? Idiots.

Message Edited by bacchussa on 06-06-2008 12:51 PM

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 16:50:14 GMT | bacchussa

Comment

And people wonder why I hate Metallica so much.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:54:02 GMT | kickinblonde

Comment

Metallica Is From Los Angeles, California

And Posting Clips Of Someone Music Like That Guy Did Is Copyrighting Anway

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:06:20 GMT | Brandenlee

Comment

Time to brush up on Metallica Brandenlee. Metallica is from the SF Bay Area, relocated to LA during the glam/hair metal years and relocated back to the Bay Area.

Other than that, who cares what Metallica's doing to 'protect' their music? At least other artists have embraced the change in times. Metallica seems to be stuck in the dark ages.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:45:04 GMT | Tbone67

Comment

Wow Metallica may be stuck in the dark ages but their music is far from their roots. Yes the were from the Bay area any old school Metallica fan like myself can tell you that. But case in point is that they have completely gone over the edge. First they fight Napster which was used by their fans and now they threaten law suits against people who write reviews about their new album? And never made any writer sign a disclosure. Are they that afaraid of their inability to write good music anymore? If they are so worried about people stealing their music then go out and do what every other blue collar worker does. GO OUT AND WORK!!!!! If you tour they will go and see you. Most other bands realize the music industry is not what it used to be so they go out and tour all the time. It's sad because I was a Metallica fan when they were completely underground now I feel betrayed but what WAS a great band.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:54:22 GMT | Daywalker5150

Comment

now wait a min,metallica still rocks and is still one of the best bands around.its one thing to write a review but quite another to steal material and release it.what if the writer in question had one of his articles ripped off by another writer and posted under their name.same principle.bottom line,its stealing!

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:44:28 GMT | metalhead2

Comment

metallica is a good band. It's too bad they subscribe to censorship. I guess that's what happens when you sell out.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:48:19 GMT | sully00

Comment

I have to agree with the whole sueing because of bad review part. That is pretty selfish of them but the whole reason they were against napster was because of other bands inablity to break through. If no one wants to buy albums then the record companys will not be spending all that case on new up and comers. simple economics

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:52:36 GMT | Mr_X

Comment

Metallica has SUCKED for 20 plus years now.This band died along with Cliff Burton so who really gives a f*#k what they are doing in 2008.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:57:12 GMT | morningstar

Comment

While Metallica has been one of the single bands that has consistantly battled the downloading of their music for free, I find nothing wrong with it! Just as metalhead2 said, no matter how you look at it stealing is stealing. Put yourself in their shoes, if it were your music wouldn't you want to make the money that you deserve off it? And the years between albums has never seemed to hurt them, just keeps their real fans waiting with baited breath to hear their next Masterpiece! I do not like everything they have come out (covering Bob Seger's "Turn The Page" was like nails on a chalkboard for me) but turn my back on them, NEVER! I think they are an amazing band and their business choices do not reflect on my like or dislike of what they come out with! Keep Rocking Metallica!

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:11:25 GMT | AnotherVoice

Comment

They made their millions years ago and now have nothing to write about. What have they got to be angry and dark about anymore. Now it just seems like they are trying manufacture things to give that edge that they had with their youth. It's something that happens to all bands. They all evolve over time. It's just that Metallica has gone in a direction that their base fans don't care for. Yet, they seem to think we are wrong for not liking it. The black album was mediocre at best and it's been down hill ever since. Newsted was smart to get out while he could.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:15:49 GMT | ab320

Comment

Maybe their next album should just be Diamond Head covers!!
They lost something after Master!!

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:29:46 GMT | JIinNH

Comment

Come on folks this isn't about illeagle downloads of music its about people writing a review of what they heard. Got to remember Metallica invited these people to a private hearing of a song. People where not asked to sign a non-disclossure aggreement. This aggrement would make it so they could not say one word on what they heard but they where never asked to sign one. Than said people wrote a review, some really positive some saying they are waiting to hear the rest of the album before they will pass judgement. Than Metallica gets mad and makes everyone take down said reviews. Shrug you don't want people to talk about what they heard you either make them sign a non-disclosure aggrement or don't have a private airing and just let people pass judgement when said album comes out.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:40:19 GMT | GGman

Comment

I'm still **bleep** that I bought that crap St. Anger album.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:52:07 GMT | buzzter

Comment

They have become nothing more than a waste of my time.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:56:52 GMT | altophish

Comment

If you invite writers to your event UNCONDITIONALLY, play your music and DON'T protect your work, the columnist is hardly accountable for publicly commenting on it. There was no theft involved. Commenting is not theft. You can't unconditionally invite the media to your event and then whine like little school girls when they do their job. Metallica is just out to sue people in my opinion. Look up sell-out in the dictionary and you'll see Metallica.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:59:50 GMT | 75645342

Comment

Isn't it funny that when they were new and struggling (and could have used the money most) all of the bootleg copies of there shows that were being traded up and down the West Coast, was "marketing".
But after they made it big and started to sell out stadiums bootlegs of their music became "stealing".

Very interesting.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:00:53 GMT | altophish

Comment

We know what really happened: They held what amounts to a press conference and wanted good reviews. When they didn't get good reviews, because they suck now, they got mad and only want good press. Well, I've got news for them. They're not hot "S" anymore because they've sold out and all turned into little princesses that always want their way.

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:20:02 GMT | 75645342

Comment

I agree Cliff must have been the bands leader because they haven`t made anything that is Blow your Head Off since Master Of Puppets. Yeah they have had a few good riffs here and there but nothing compairs to Puppets. I remember reading back in1986 in Rolling Stone mag that Metallica was the next Led Zepplin. Then just like Zepplin they should call it quits. And that video about them seeing a shrink. Give me a **bleep**ing break!! Go whine to someone else! I couldn`t believe that crap!! No wonder Jason left the band!!!!  I can`t believe they would even let this be aired or put on video. When I saw this video of them being in front of a shrink and when Dave Mustaine a former member was sitting there crying like a little baby I`m thinking what has  Heavy Metal come too.  A bunch of whinning little whimps with too much money on there hands. Pull your head out of your asses and get on with the music or at least have the courage to take your own life like Kurt Cobain or Jimmy Hendrix or some of the greats that they knew it was time to go or just didn`t give a **bleep** any more and just wanted to get away from the business of the music industry.  What happened to these guy`s?

Message Edited by brendajames6969 on 06-06-2008 06:52 PM

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:38:41 GMT | brendajames6969

Loading...