Popcast
Portman Speaks Out on ‘Eating Animals’
By Audrey Morrison
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:17:55 GMT
They say a picture is worth a thousand words. After reading Jonathan Safran Foer's book “Eating Animals,” actress and Harvard alum Natalie Portman used 3,661 of them to paint a image of disgust for the world’s carnivores, via The Huffington Post.Don’t be fooled—Portman is petite, but she has a lot to say. After all, she goes so far as to proclaim that the book “changed me from a twenty-year vegetarian to a vegan activist.”
She talks about being interrogated for her belief in making animals pets or companions instead of dinner, but has been hesitant to feel “as if I know better than someone else.” Now the 27-year-old is letting her animal-loving voice be heard.
“Perhaps others disagree with me that animals have personalities, but the highly documented torture of animals is unacceptable,” she writes. “And the human cost Foer describes in his book, of which I was previously unaware, is universally compelling.”
Portman goes on to compare serving meat for dinner guests to advocating rape. She writes, sarcastically, “I don't believe in rape, but if it's what it takes to please my dinner hosts, then so be it.”
The gist of “Eating Animals” seems to be that we as humans with free will should stop to consider the connection between environmental conditions and the food we are consuming.
Portman is just one of many celebrities who have given up on meat.
She concludes that she agrees with Foer, who in the end realizes that the big question is about we are in the grand scheme of things and how will we define ourselves.
|
What Do You Think? Do Portman's strong opinions sway you? Are you interested in reading the book she talks about? Click here to comment |
Message Edited by Audrey_Morrison on 10-27-2009 06:25 PM
Comment
Consumption on meat on the same level as rape? And apparently something done in order to please dinner guests. I guess it is time to start locking up all of the felines. While we're at it - don't forget the other carnivorous mammals...meat-eating reptiles, worm-sharing birds, and the fighting fish. After all...if they have a personality, can't it be taught to be vegan? Wait...let's not act too quickly. Just think what that will do to the food chain...lest not to forget the certain holocaust to occur upon edible plant life. Can you imagine the number of prisons we will need? It will take a huge effort to build them and we will need some space. Let's set aside Australia as it has history as a penal colony. Then again...so does Oklahoma. In the mean time, we can set up some prison camps. I guess there's a bright side...jobs.NP...two words: food chain. I guess I could agree with you if humans were the only carnivorous animal on the planet. Too bad humans are natural omnivores. I love being an omnivore. I can't imagine Thanksgiving turkey without mashed potatoes and cranberry sauce. Whoops...gotta go...my steak is about to go from rare to medium rare. A crime in this house.
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:03:29 GMT | TheArbiter
Comment
I eat meat only, I eat no plants, they have personalities.I have alot of plants in my house and they help the air we breath in and out. God, save the plants.... They are helpless with out some one to look out for them...
Thank You: A Plant Lover
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:06:22 GMT | boldII
Comment
I am a Native American and my ancestors and I have hunted for our food - the sacred hunt for centuries. I believe we are more connected and care more for our mother earth than most. Natalie forgets some basic truths about life on our planet - in order to eat - something must die. When you plant your crops - animals loose their habitat. When deer and other animals feed on our crops - they are killed and eaten so that the crops may grow. If Natalie truly wants to walk her talk, maybe she should give up eating altogether.Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:13:45 GMT | Aron8
Comment
Who does not know that there is a big dif. between having animals for consumption or as pets? Does the fact that my family and I have meat almost every night of the week mean that we like to torture animals? Does Miss Portman think because she has a couple of $$$$ in the bank that we should listen to her?!?!?!?! I LOVE meat and don't ever see myself giving it up for anything or anyone!!!!!!Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:14:49 GMT | jmanson
Comment
I would be very interested in reading the book that is being referenced. Anytime someones entire way of thinking changes regarding something as important as their diet I am interested in the information used to support the drastic change. I believe the information in this book must be fact filled and profound indeed!Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:32:53 GMT | comcastfriend
Comment
If Natalie Portman wants to live in denial of her natural history, maybe she should consider filing flat her canine teeth, and having her forward facing eyes surgically moved to the sides of her head, like other prey animals. Face it nat, humans are omnivores, at the top of the food chain. I agree that many animals have feelings and emotions. This does not invalidate them as sources of nutrition for animals that are higher on the food chain. People out in the wild who are stalked and eaten by bears for instance, have feelings, and are scared literally to death as they are preyed upon. This doesn't change the fact that to the bear, they're food. Enjoy your tofu.Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:39:21 GMT | HUNTER_ED
Comment
It is obvious that not only has Ms. Portman's life been priveleged, but it has been sheltered...from even evil things like the Bible. In Genesis, It says that God...himself!...gave animals of the field to Adam and Eve for food. ...and how sacrelidious! He actually took animal skins to make coats of skins for them to clothe their bodies as He sent them out of the Garden of Eden. I guess that makes God evil...according to PETA's standards, anyway. And rape??? My body require meat protein because it won't/can't digest plant proteins. So I use the plants to give me oxygen to live everyday...and oh, yes...I AM a rape survivor! Believe me...eating meat every day to live is nothing like rape!Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:46:35 GMT | TrinkaLou
Comment
vegetarians and vegans just kill things that cant get away. every notice how all of the liberal activists always want for you to change your opinion and way of life just because they do. hell let portman rape, murder and eat plants. after all arent they living organisms as well, while i continue to comsume tasty and scrumptious meat. just form natalie i am having a nice juicy steak tonite for dinner.Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:48:56 GMT | r2kl
Comment
Sc**w Portman and the old horse she rode in on. I'm a carnivore! I love meat.Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:52:35 GMT | bamagal
Comment
obama just appointed a new czar ,cal sunstein, who believes that animals should be able to sue people in civil court for damages and be represented by human lawyers. boy, that obama really has this country on the right track!Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:55:39 GMT | bucky1470
Comment
I think first people should read Portman's article from the Huffington Post. This comcast article takes some of her quotes out of context, which in turn, makes them seem a bit more harsh and arrogant than they really are. She begins by talking about farms that mass produce meat and their impacts, which is really something that all people should educate themselves more about, vegetarian or not. If anything, it would encourage people to buy more organic and locally raised meat. I figured if I am going to eat meat, I should be more responsible about it by knowing more where my meat comes from.Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:12:59 GMT | littlefocker24
Comment
"Don’t be fooled—Portman is petite, but she has a lot to say"Big deal - show me a celebrity these days who *doesn't* have a lot to say...
"but the highly documented torture of animals is unacceptable"
And that performance of yours that you foisted upon us for the second Star Wars trilogy, and suckered us all into sitting through, you didn't consider that to the torture of innocent creatures and children? Boy, I sure do.
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:20:15 GMT | SilentBoy741
Comment
Everyone has their opinion.But as the bible says in Genesis 1:26 "And God said, let us make man in our image,after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth,and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
If Ms. Portmans distant reletives did not eat meat, it is a good chance that she would not be around to protest.
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:23:37 GMT | bobsr46
Comment
Then you're gonna really dig "Mein Kampf"...
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:25:40 GMT | SilentBoy741
Comment
This world would be a better place if there weren't so many self righteous celebrity **bleep** bags trying to make the world a better place!!Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:26:17 GMT | Surly-1
Comment
I think it is great that Natalie Portman is speaking up for the animals. I am vegan & an animal rights activist, and I have heard all the same comments that have been listed here as reasons for eating animals. Eating animals is not healthy nor is it something God wants humans to do. Religion & plants having feeling are two crazy excuses meat eaters use to make paying other people to butcher & kill innocent animals appear ok. I have been vegan for many yrs, and I am not sick . Watch the video "Meet your Meat" on youtube, and then ask yourself is this right???Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:28:55 GMT | KATHLEENW
Comment
Again, Harvard disappoints ... if they turn out this kind of "thinking" alum ... well, lets just say she could run for President!!Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:30:49 GMT | FLBrkr
Comment
Does this mean we need to eradicate all the Flycatcher plants since they are killing innocent Flies?Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:34:49 GMT | FLBrkr
Comment
I kinda look at people who are vegans the same way I look at nuns or monks - it's their right, more power to them, but there's no way I'm depriving myself like that.Message Edited by ramonaforever on 10-27-2009 10:39 PM
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:37:58 GMT | ramonaforever